Cultural Relativism and Whistleblowing Essay

Explain victimisation the ethics of ethnic relativism the advantages and disadvantages of tin tin whistle blowing ethnic relativism is the principle regarding the beliefs, values, and practices of a farming from the viewpoint of that grow itself (Chegg.com 2012). It is the concept that the importance of a particular cultural idea varies from matchless society or societal subgroup to another(prenominal) and that good and moral ideals are relative to what a particular society or culture believes to be good or bad, right or wrong. In other words, right and wrong are culture-specific what is considered moral in one society whitethorn be considered illegal in another, and, since no general standard of morality exists, no one has the right to judge another societys customs. According to Philosophy All About.org (2012) the view that the change moral or estimable systems are all equally sensible is based on the idea that there is no ultimate standard of good or evil so every j udgment or so right and wrong is a product of society. Therefore, any opinion on morality or ethics is subject to the cultural perspective of individually someone.Ultimately, this means that no moral or ethical system bunghole be considered the best, or worst, and no particular moral or ethical position fucking actually be considered right or wrong. Cultural perspective therefore depose help us understand why certain executions are considered right or wrong by a particular culture. The actions beingness referred to include the act of whistle blowing. Boatwright (2009 90) defines the act whistle blowing as the release of information by a member or former member of an shaping that is evidence of illegal and/or immoral conduct in the organisation or conduct in the organisation that is not in the public interest.Nadler and Schulman (2006) assert that whistle blowing is intricately connect to ethics in that it represents a persons understanding, at a deep level, that an action his or her organisation is taking is taking is foul and that it interferes with peoples rights or is unfair or detracts from the common good. The skepticism therefore from a cultural relativism perspective is, through which cultures lens is the common good being viewed. If in the prevailing culture whistle blowing is a common and acceptable practice an atmosphere where the advantages of whistle blowing has been cultivated.According to Trimborn (2012) the most important of the advantages is that whistle-blowing ofttimes ends long-standing wrongdoing that would have other than continued. Organisations who encourage a whistle blowing culture, promote transparent structure and effective, eject communication. More importantly, whistle blowing can protect the validations clients. Trimborn (2012) cites the display case of a hospital employing a number of negligent staff members. Other, to a greater extent ethically inclined, employees would need to bring such issues to the hospitals a ttention, protect the organization from possible lawsuits or severe mishaps resulting in a patient ofs demise. In the case of clear workplace violations of health and arctic regulations, or breach of employment laws, workers are protected and their rights upheld. With regard to look for or technical issues, whistle-blowers may cite internal memos and other keep to prove doubts existed about a product (such as a cover up of certain medication dangers) or that false research results were bopingly published.Whistle-blowers often highlight safety concerns regarding cars or other products, thus protecting an trusting public. Whistle-blowing upholds the law, protects many from the impact of wrongdoing, reveals the truth and prevents further wrongdoing. In cultures where whistle-blowing is frowned upon devastating consequences can be visited upon the whistle blower. Trimborn (2012) reveals some of whistle blowings negative repercussions. Firstly, it can bring termination of the whis tle-blowers services by the organization. It would be difficult to remain, no matter how justifiable the decision to reveal illegalities and no matter how much the revelations would actually benefit others. Secondly, big-time revelations could bring down the organization causing everyone to lose their jobs.Thirdly, the whistle-blower can get stigmatized as unpatriotic and be discredited in some way. Fourthly, the organization and sometimes colleagues may exact some form of revenge on the whistle-blower in retribution. Thus, the whistle-blower is somehow blamed for the wrongdoing and fired without an opportunity for vindication. In communities, the whistle-blower and family may be subject to hostile treatment, viewed as performing out of self-interest with a view to gaining advancement at others expense.In conclusion, unless culture, practice and the law indicate that it is safe and accepted for whistle-blowers to raise a genuine concern about corruption or illegality, workers will confiscate that they risk victimisation, losing their job or damaging their career. They even risk being cast out or ostracised by the communities they emanate from. In cultures where a safety net for whistle-blowers exists the whistle-blower is marked as a person of integrity who has the backbone to do what is right no matter what. It lets others know the whistle-blower can be trusted to deal with others honestly. It also limits the effect of intimidation tactics designed to sway whistle-blowers from taking appropriate action where necessary (Young 2007).