The Perils of Regionalism:Genocide in Rwanda :: essays research papers

In Priestleys Wrong Ism, he claims that nationalism is not the strength that binds a country together, but quite a all told of the small local argonas we are all accustomed to evolution up in that gives us strength. Priestley considers nationalistic ideas and movements to be headed by spate who have a love of power and who have left off their regional ties. They no longer have feelings for the areas they came from and any loyalty develop over their lifetime is watered d consume.Priestley feels regionalism needs to be given much credit. He assumes it provides us with roots and a sense of attachment to our confederation which affect rafts lives in such(prenominal) a port that it creates a unique bond that can be very straining to break. So in a sense, regionalism shapes our identities and I agree with his assumption that pack view themselves more as part of their region rather than a part of their nation. Loyalty to ones region can be compromised when individuals allow n ational power and greed to destroy their roots.There are many examples of how nationalism tries to take over a region to destroy its people. For instance genocide, in nearly all examples, has been started by a power-hungry national figure who has an agenda in mind that never takes into account what a local areas wish might be for their future. Hitler is an example of this type of swaggering oppressor who had a very complex national strategy in institutionalize to exterminate the Jews. He certainly did not consider or screw regional differences in Europe, but rather put forth his own agenda. Genocide is on a whole distinguishable level than all other crimes against humanity. The circumstance I will describe shows how Priestleys impression of internationalism also comes into play showing how our global watchdog agencies, such as the UN, can be slow to respond to an atrocity. For the most part, the UN has avoided and has not responded to many genocidal conflicts. Every time subje cts of genocide or other homogeneous crimes against humanity have come up, debate was intense. This probably occurred because of the many different world perspectives and ideas concerning human suffering. In addition, the punishment of genocide deals with the crime later on the annihilation of people occurs. The real problem to be dealt with is that of prevention of such crimes. It seems that a large percentage of every population are ready(a) to obey national authority and be controlled, especially when many of the people are suffering from oppression and