“Not My Best Side” U A Fanthorpe Essay

In Not My Best Side U A Fanthorpe ch anyenges the traditional, stereotypical oddballs in the legend Of St George and the flying potassium hydrogen tartrate nevertheless to replace them with another(prenominal) equally stereotypical setIn the poem Not my scoop side U A Fanthorpe has challenged the orthodox go steadys of the characters in Uccellos moving-picture show of St George and the Dragon. She has successfully manipulated them into neo day caricatures.Through traditional stereotypical views and legends, Uccello has portray the fire-breathing dragon as grotesque and beastly. Yet this is the dragon whom a son no older than a teenager, can tame. The poem contrasts any stereotypical view the reviewer may support interpreted and reveals that the dragon is no more than innocent than the other characters.In the world-class sentence of the first stanza, the reader is confronted by a dress conscientious victim of contrive this is hardly a fire-breathing monster. The dragon c riticises all exclusively himself, from the painter Uccello who, didnt give me a chance to pose properly to the, horse with a deformed neck. Fanthorpe has given such a beast a pitiful personality the painter is described as a, poor young man however this is not an obvious reaction expected from such a beast. The phrases used by the dragon portray how the poem is the inverse of the characterisation itself.The fact that the angle of the picture was not in his favour has be to disappoint the dragon deeply but he forgets the fact that he is about to be defeated and overcomes this with an answer I always progression again. The character is quick to point out such suppositional absurdities as, what, after all ar two feet to a monster? and how his conqueror travels on a horse, with a deformed neck. His questions convey his sorrowfulness of being mocked, from his point of view his killers and victims come out to be blind, juvenile or ugly. Not taking things, as seriously as he sho uld, the dragon tends to ask rhetorical questions should my conqueror be so ostentatiously whisker little(prenominal)? and, Why should my victim be so unattractive as to be inedible? The character does not think why they should take him any longer seriously than he is prep ared to take them.Two diametrically contend personalities, angiotensin converting enzyme from Uccellos painting of St George and the Dragon, the other from U A Fanthorpes poem of Not My Best Side are never the less the same person. Painted unnaturally white and almost glowing, the young muliebrity in the painting could be described as a symbolism of virginity. She would be insulted to be given such a personality to the one in the poem where her casual sexual attitude is most evident in the double entendres wearing machinery and, see all his equipment throughout the stanza. How these phrases are interpreted, is up to the reader. Half way through the second stanza the reader infers that she would have focused her attention on another issue but sooner she is now talking of how she would enjoy being eaten by the dragon and assumes that all girls would analogous the same. Fanthorpe has prescribed to the girl a rather a redbrick womans personality rather than the image of a more biblical girl.Her language and her sentences are modern and appear slightly immature. whiz would usually associate phrases like, And the way he looked at me with a teenager. iodin would not assume a religious orthodox figure to be using phrases such as, he might have acne, blackheads or notwithstanding bad breath. As well as being tiny she overly insults her heros manhood, when this boy turns up. Indeed her announcement I didnt much fancy him shows her first thought that on the face of it ran through her mind when she was about to be rescued from death by the very same boy. Fanthorpe has created a similarity between the two characters of the dragon and the young woman. Both are far more concerned with their image and what others think of them than the reality of the situation. It could be said that her second stanza creates a less than glamorous image of todays new woman.St George. The legendary character who is said to be the fearless slayer of the almighty dragon. However in this stanza, St George shatters our illusions as Fanthorpe allows St George to speak for himself. He is boastful about his, machinery and brags how he is amend to a degree in Dragon management and so-called consummate(a) Reclamation. Even his horse now sounds more like a car as he mentions it has, Automatic transmission. The first tail fin lines of the stanza show how the traditional story has been put into a modern context.They also show how his own stupidity can make a put-on of him. His words, Virgin Reclamation are an example of his arrogance because he hopes to locomote by using words longer than two syllables. Also he thinks that killing is a form of management. Such euphemisms and vocabulary choices n ot only make him look ignorant and boastful but also are not the words that should be coming out of the mouth of a true hero. His, custom built spear makes him sound like a modern day hero, a James Bond, type but as he is only a boy he has a just few years remaining before he takes on the role. By giving St George elaborate twentieth Century technical vocabulary Fanthorpe has flee from the biblical sense of the picture to a stereotypical and has equalled him to a modern day Essex man.He attention seeking makes him appear snobbish, You cant do better than meIm qualified and equipped. The reader would expect that it would be highly discomforting to be rescued by a hero with this bragging persona. Fanthorpe has created a complete inverse of the legendary character. St Georges more chauvinist qualities leak through when he intimidates the woman by asking her how or if she would like to be rescued.He is expecting her to take on the role of Sleeping Beauty waiting for the strong and han dsome prince. St Georges expectations are worked when he tells her that she could be, endangering job prospects if she does not wish to cooperate. Here, he has taken on a very sexist attitude, and although it seems as if he would like to save the lives of others, once again he shows his ignorance by telling her, Whatdoes it motion what You want? Youre in my way. He is only opinion of himself. Here in the third stanza is the third vision of a ungenerous personality. Fanthorpes modern day caricatures are not complementaryThe three characters in this poem hold quite different opinions yet are extremely similar in the way that each character is as different as the other. They do not like being criticised but do not think how their insults to others are even more critical, subfusc as to be inedible. In each of the stanzas the characters start off with amiable comments but as they progress to the end of the stanza the points they have made appear ruder and their egotism reveals itsel f. The last lines all end with a sarcastic comment. exclusively the characters are not too worried about anyone but them self. everywhere all they are looking after the image of number one, which seems to be the only thing that matters. Fanthorpes images of three types have little of the eldritch among them. As I read about thoughts, which are materialistic, vain or lustful, I learn that Fanthorpe seems concerned with showing us not our lift out sides.